Library Comparison
This page provides an objective comparison of SynState with popular state management libraries. The goal is to help you understand the trade-offs and choose the right tool for your project.
| Library | Core Paradigm | Derived Values | Async Operators Built-in | Glitch-free | React Compiler | Vanilla (No React) | Maintenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SynState | Observable (custom) | Yes (operators) | Yes | Yes (push-based) | Fully compatible | Yes | Active |
| RxJS | Observable (ReactiveX) | Yes (operators) | Yes | No | N/A | Yes | Low activity (last commit: 2025-02) |
| MobX | Proxy-based reactive | Yes (computed) | No | N/A (pull-based / lazy) | Incompatible (opt-out) | Yes | Active |
| Jotai | Atomic state | Yes (derived atoms) | Partial | N/A (pull-based / lazy) | Compatible | Yes (vanilla store) | Active |
| Redux | Flux / single store | Yes (selectors) | No (middleware) | N/A (pull-based) | Compatible | Yes | Active |
| Zustand | Flux-inspired store | No (inline selectors) | No | N/A (pull-based) | Compatible | Yes | Active |
| Valtio | Proxy-based mutable | No (separate derive) | No | N/A (pull-based) | Compatible | Yes | Active |
| Recoil | Atomic state (React) | Yes (selectors) | Partial | N/A (pull-based / lazy) | Compatible | No | Abandoned (last commit: 2023-09) |
| XState | Finite state machines | Via context | No | N/A | Compatible | Yes | Active |
| TanStack Query | Server-state cache | N/A | Yes (fetch) | N/A | Compatible | Yes | Active |
Benchmarked Libraries
Section titled “Benchmarked Libraries”The following libraries are included in SynState’s performance benchmark. Each section highlights the library’s characteristics and ideal use cases.
SynState
Section titled “SynState”SynState is built on a custom glitch-free Observable implementation. It provides a unified API that scales from simple shared state (createState) to complex asynchronous workflows with operators like debounce, throttle, and switchMap.
Strengths:
- Glitch-free derived value propagation — no inconsistent intermediate states.
- Rich operator set built in (no need for a separate stream library).
- Framework-agnostic core with dedicated React/Preact hooks packages.
- Type-safe throughout.
Best for: Projects that need both simple shared state and sophisticated async pipelines in a single, consistent API.
RxJS is the reference implementation of the ReactiveX Observable specification. It offers an extensive library of operators for composing asynchronous and event-based programs.
Strengths:
- Massive operator library (200+ operators).
- Well-established ecosystem and community.
- Excellent for complex event processing (WebSocket streams, retry logic, etc.).
Trade-offs:
- Suffers from the glitch problem when combining synchronous derived values.
- Reactive stream programming requires a paradigm shift from imperative thinking — developers must reason about asynchronous data flows over time, understand the distinction between Cold and Hot Observables, and choose carefully among similar operators (e.g.
switchMapvsmergeMapvsconcatMap). - Not designed specifically for state management.
Best for: Applications heavily centered on asynchronous event processing where the glitch issue is acceptable.
MobX uses transparent reactive programming via JavaScript proxies. Mutations to observable objects automatically trigger re-computation of computed values and re-rendering of observer components.
Strengths:
- Intuitive mutable-style API — mutate state directly and everything updates.
- Fine-grained reactivity with automatic dependency tracking.
- Avoids glitches via pull-based lazy evaluation (
computedvalues are recomputed on-demand when read by areaction).
Trade-offs:
- Implicit dependency tracking can make data flow harder to trace in large codebases.
- No built-in asynchronous operators (use
flowor external solutions). - Higher overhead per update compared to simpler store libraries.
observer()HOC tracks observable access during rendering, making it incompatible with React Compiler (requires"use no memo"directive to opt out).
Best for: Teams that prefer mutable programming style with automatic reactivity and don’t need complex async operators.
Jotai provides primitive atoms as the building block for state. Derived atoms compose naturally, and the createStore API enables framework-agnostic usage.
Strengths:
- Atomic model avoids unnecessary re-renders.
- Composable derived atoms with automatic dependency tracking.
- Small bundle size.
Trade-offs:
- No built-in asynchronous operator chain (async atoms exist but are limited).
- Higher per-update overhead due to store-level bookkeeping.
store.sub()callback does not receive the current value (signature is() => void), requiring a separatestore.get(atom)call to read the new value — less ergonomic for vanilla (non-React) usage. In contrast, SynState’sobservable$.subscribe((value) => { ... })passes the value directly to the callback.
Best for: React applications that benefit from fine-grained atomic state with simple derivations.
Redux (Redux Toolkit)
Section titled “Redux (Redux Toolkit)”Redux is a predictable state container based on the Flux architecture. Redux Toolkit simplifies boilerplate with createSlice and configureStore.
Strengths:
- Predictable unidirectional data flow.
- Excellent DevTools for time-travel debugging.
- Massive ecosystem (middleware, sagas, thunks).
Trade-offs:
- Verbose boilerplate even with Redux Toolkit.
- Selectors (via Reselect) are pull-based and require manual memoization.
- No built-in reactive propagation — async logic delegated to middleware.
Best for: Large teams that value strict unidirectional data flow, time-travel debugging, and a mature middleware ecosystem.
Zustand
Section titled “Zustand”Zustand is a small, fast, flux-inspired store. It provides a minimal API with excellent TypeScript support and React integration.
Strengths:
- Extremely lightweight and fast for simple state.
- Minimal API surface — easy to learn.
- No providers needed in React.
Trade-offs:
- No built-in derived-value primitive — derivations are inline selectors.
- Cannot combine independent derived values (excluded from Diamond Dependency benchmark).
- No asynchronous operators.
Best for: Projects that need simple shared state with minimal overhead and don’t require complex derivations.
Valtio
Section titled “Valtio”Valtio uses JavaScript proxies to provide a mutable-style API where you write to a proxy object and subscribers are notified automatically.
Strengths:
- Extremely intuitive API — just mutate an object.
- Small bundle size.
- Automatic render optimization in React via
useSnapshot.
Trade-offs:
- No built-in derived-value primitive in the vanilla API (
deriveis a separate utility). - Cannot combine independent derived values (excluded from Diamond Dependency benchmark).
- Proxy-based change detection has edge cases with certain data structures.
Best for: Projects that want the simplest possible mutable API for shared state without complex derivations.
Non-Benchmarked Libraries
Section titled “Non-Benchmarked Libraries”The following libraries serve different primary purposes and are not included in the performance benchmark, but are worth considering depending on your requirements.
Recoil
Section titled “Recoil”Recoil is an experimental atomic state management library by Meta, designed specifically for React.
Why not benchmarked: Recoil is no longer actively maintained (last npm release in 2023) and is tightly coupled to React — it has no framework-agnostic vanilla API, making a fair comparison impractical.
Strengths:
- Pioneered the atomic state model for React.
- Built-in async selectors.
- Concurrent Mode support.
Considerations: If you are starting a new project, Jotai is a maintained alternative that was inspired by Recoil’s atomic model.
XState
Section titled “XState”XState is a state machine and statechart library. It models application logic as finite state machines with explicit states, transitions, and side effects.
Why not benchmarked: XState solves a fundamentally different problem — modeling application logic as state machines — rather than providing a general-purpose reactive state container. A propagation-speed benchmark would not meaningfully represent XState’s value.
Strengths:
- Formally verifiable logic via state machines and statecharts.
- Visual editor (Stately) for designing state machines.
- Excellent for complex UI flows (wizards, authentication, media players).
Best for: Applications with well-defined states and transitions where formal correctness matters more than raw propagation speed.
TanStack Query
Section titled “TanStack Query”TanStack Query (formerly React Query) is a server-state management library focused on fetching, caching, and synchronizing server data.
Why not benchmarked: TanStack Query manages server-state (HTTP cache, refetching, pagination), not client-side reactive state. It is complementary to libraries like SynState rather than a direct alternative.
Strengths:
- Automatic caching, deduplication, and background refetching.
- Stale-while-revalidate strategy out of the box.
- Framework-agnostic (React, Vue, Solid, Svelte adapters).
Best for: Any application that fetches data from a server. Often used alongside a client-state library.
Choosing the Right Library
Section titled “Choosing the Right Library”| Your requirement | Recommended |
|---|---|
| Simple shared state (dark mode, user session) | SynState, Zustand, Valtio, Jotai |
| Complex async pipelines (debounce, switchMap, retry) | SynState, RxJS |
| Glitch-free derived values | SynState, MobX, Jotai |
| Mutable-style API | MobX, Valtio |
| Atomic / fine-grained reactivity | SynState, Jotai |
| Strict unidirectional data flow | SynState, Redux |
| Formal state machines | XState |
| Server-state caching | TanStack Query |
| Minimal bundle + simple API | SynState, Zustand, Valtio |
| Unified API from simple to complex | SynState |
Performance Comparison
Section titled “Performance Comparison”For detailed benchmark results comparing propagation speed across libraries, see the Performance Benchmark page.